Misdemeanor DUI

Exercising Your Rights to a Jury Trial After a California DUI Arrest

June 14, 2010 | Ronald N. Hoffman

Anyone charged with a DUI or other criminal offense is entitled by the Constitution to a jury trial. At a jury trial the prosecution is for acquired to put on sufficient evidence to prove that you are guilty of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

In a California DUI case, the state must prove that the officer had probable cause to stop you. This critical element requires that the driver violated at least one or more of the sections of the vehicle code. Examples of common reasons to stop a driver in a DUI arrest are speeding, weaving, following too close, or failing to stop at a stop sign.

Although most of our clients contest the issue of their own impairment at the time that they were driving and stopped by the police, physical and/or mental impairment is not a requirement of a driving under the influence prosecution.

Protecting Our Clients Rights After a Los Angeles Drunk Driving Arrest

May 31, 2010 | Ronald N. Hoffman

It is important to understand the scope of issues involving being prosecuted on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. A DUI arrest begins a systematic process by the Department of Motor Vehicles to suspend your driving privileges, even if this is your first offense.

Although both the court and the DMV procedures seek to sanction a driver for the unlawful use of a motor vehicle after the consumption of an illegal level of alcohol or drugs, they go about it in very different ways. Each entity follows different guidelines, and separate issues and procedures, and totally different consequences. The main thrust of the DMV is to determine whether or not the alleged DUI driver was stopped by the police with proper cause, and whether or not the driver had a blood alcohol level (BAC) of .08 or over. More severe and longer suspensions are doled out to drivers who refuse to submit to a chemical test, after being stopped on suspicion of driving under the influence.

The courts approach the issues above, but use different sanctions. A range of potential penalties including probation, fines, jail time, alcohol programs, community service, hospital/morgue programs, and mothers against drunk drivers meetings, as well as Alcoholics Anonymous attendance are some of the legislated penalties facing those convicted of DUI’s.

What is an Arraignment in a Los Angeles DUI or Criminal Case ?

May 3, 2010 | Ronald N. Hoffman

The first hearing subsequent to one’s arrest is called an arraignment. Any person arrested for a misdemeanor offense, and not released to the court on their own recognizance,or by posting bail must be brought to court for their arraignment within 48 hours of their arrest. This constitutional requirement does not count weekends or holidays.

Anyone arrested for a felony offense, and not released on their own recognizance, or by posting bail, must be brought to court for their arraignment within 72 hours of their arrest. Like misdemeanor cases, weekends and holidays are not counted towards this constitutional time requirement.

Since all people arrested, are presumed innocent until proven guilty, an arraignment is an opportunity to commence legal proceedings by giving the accused an opportunity to plead not guilty, after being advised of the charges being filed by the prosecutor. At a clients arraignment the charges are read, as well as the possible consequences of the charges,in the event the defendant pleads quilty, or isfound quilty after a curt or jury trial.

California Legal Defense in DUI and Criminal Cases Should be a Partnership Between Lawyer And Client

April 4, 2010 | Ronald N. Hoffman

When clients are unfortunately faced with being prosecuted for a DUI or other Criminal offense, it is not uncommon to feel overwhelmed and fearful about their rights, defenses and possible consequences they could face if they were found guilty.

The most important decision is selecting an attorney who firstly they trust, treats them with compassion and respect, And yet is completely honest. This lawyer should possess extensive experience and courtroom skill, as well as possessing long-standing relationships with judges and prosecutors which gives them a rich and deep understanding of the treacherous waters of the legal justice system.

Potential clients should be wary of attorneys who are not willing to explain their defense strategies for protecting you, but merely say ‘don’t worry, I’ll take care of everything’.This keep you in the dark style of representation was popular many years ago in the legal community, but although still present among some attorneys, thankfully is in the minority.

California DUI, Felonies vs. Misdemeanors

March 26, 2010 | Ronald N. Hoffman

A DUI conviction can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. The difference between the two will affect the final sentence given. A misdemeanor conviction will receive a sentence on the lighter side of the spectrum whereas a felony will receive a much harsher punishment, especially when there is significant bodily harm.

California Vehicle Code 23152 is the section under which a misdemeanor DUI is charged. It is divided up into two sections. 23152(a) reads that It is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or drug, or under the combined influence of any alcoholic beverage and drug, to drive a vehicle. 23152 (b) reads that It is unlawful for any person who has 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood to drive a vehicle.s23152(a) was the previous DUI law and 23152(b) was added 20 years ago.sThe legal Blood Alcohol Level (BAC) used to be a .10% and has been reduced to .08% in California with a trend towards reducing it further to .06%. Compared to many countries who require a .0% BAC, we are still much more tolerant. A conviction under either 23152(a) or 23152(b) will result in a misdemeanor charge.

California Vehicle Code 23153sis the code section under which a felony DUI is charged. Like misdemeanor DUI, it is divided into the two same sections with one additional statement. 23153 (a) reads; It is unlawful for any person, while under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or drug, or under the combined influence of any alcoholic beverage and drug, to drive a vehicle and concurrently do any act forbidden by law, or neglect any duty imposed by law in driving the vehicle, which act or neglect proximately causes bodily injury to any person other than the driver.s23153(b) reads that it is It is unlawful for any person, while having 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood to drive a vehicle and concurrently do any act forbidden by law, or neglect any duty imposed by law in driving the vehicle, which act or neglect proximately causes bodily injury to any person other than the driver.